Canon EF 70-200 F2.8 L IS II USM
Introduction

The EF 70-200mm F2.8 L IS II USM was announced in January 2010 as a replacement for Canon’s fast image-stabilized telephoto zoom, the EF 70-200mm F2.8 L IS USM, which dates from 2001. With the rapid increase in SLR sensor pixel counts placing lenses’ optical qualities under ever finer scrutiny, the company clearly felt it was time for an update for this professional workhorse, and has revamped the design accordingly. In the process, it claims to have improved almost every aspect of the lens, including the optics, autofocus, image stabilization, and the mechanical design.
The optical formula is suitably complex – 23 elements in 19 groups – and includes no fewer than five ultra-low dispersion (UD) glass elements, plus one made from fluorite, to minimize chromatic aberration. The minimum focus distance has been decreased giving improved maximum magnification, the IS system updated to give a claimed 4 stops of stabilization, and the autofocus system revised to meet the demands of Canon’s latest fast, high-resolution DSLRs such as the EOS-1D Mark IV. The lens is also, as is usual for Canon’s L series optics, fully sealed against dust and water.
…
Of course all this comes at a considerable price – as usual with a new release, the ‘II’ lens commands a hefty premium over the previous version of the lens, which also makes it around four times as expensive as its (non-image stabilized) third party rivals from the likes of Sigma and Tamron. Indeed with an introductory price well over the $2000 mark, many potential upgraders will surely be wondering whether the improvements can possibly be worth the money. Over the next few pages we’ll do our best to find out.
Headline features
- 70-200mm focal length range; fast F2.8 constant maximum aperture
- Optical image stabilization – 4 stops
- Ring-type USM focusing with full-time manual override
- EF mount for Canon 35mm full-frame and APS-C DSLRS
Angle of view
The pictures below illustrate the focal length range from wide to telephoto, on 35mm full-frame and APS-C camera bodies:
![]() |
![]() |
| 70mm (full frame) | 200mm (full frame) |
|---|
![]() |
![]() |
| 70mm (APS-C; 112mm equivalent) | 200mm (APS-C; 320mm equivalent) |
|---|
Canon EF 70-200mm 1:2.8 L IS II USM specifications
| Price | • US: $2500 • UK: £2200 |
|---|---|
| Date introduced | January 2010 |
| Maximum format size | 35mm full frame |
| Focal length | 70-200mm |
| 35mm equivalent focal length (APS-C) |
112-320mm |
| Diagonal Angle of view (FF) | 34º – 12º |
| Diagonal Angle of view (APS-C) | 23º – 8º |
| Maximum aperture | F2.8 |
| Minimum aperture | F32 |
| Lens Construction | • 23 elements/19 groups • 5 UD elements • 1 Fluorite element |
| Number of diaphragm blades | 8, rounded |
| Minimum focus | 1.2m |
| Maximum magnification | 0.21x at 200mm |
| AF motor type | • Ring-type Ultrasonic Motor • Full-time manual focus |
| Focus method | Internal |
| Zoom method | Internal |
| Image stabilization | • 4 stops claimed • Dual mode – Normal and panning |
| Filter thread | • 77mm • Does not rotate on focus |
| Supplied accessories | • Front and rear caps • ET-87 Hood • LZ1324 Soft Case |
| Weight | 1490 g (3.3 lb) |
| Dimensions | 89 mm diameter x 199 mm length (3.5 x 7.8 in) |
| Lens Mount | Canon EF only |
| Other | Dust and moisture resistant Supplies distance information for E-TTL II flash metering |
* Supplied accessories may differ in each country or area
Compared to Canon EF 70-200mm F2.8 L IS USM
Here’s the EF 70-200mm F2.8 L IS II USM side-by-side with the previous version, plus Nikon’s latest AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm F2.8G ED VR II for comparison. The new lens is not only named near-identically to it’s predecessor, it’s visually a doppelganger too. Presumably on the basis that there was not a lot wrong for Canon to change, the differences are extremely subtle, the most obvious being the enlarged focus ring. The switch panel on the side of the lens has slimmed down a little, the barrel shape has been slightly re-sculpted, and the distance scale restyled. The new lens also gains a new hood, which has a locking button on the side to prevent it from being accidentally rotated or knocked off. The new and old hoods are not cross-compatible.
Internally, though, the lenses are rather different. The revised optical formula now has five UD glass elements rather than four, and includes an element made from the most exotic material in Canon’s armory – fluorite. The IS has been updated to Canon’s latest 4-stop system, and the minimum focus distance slightly improved from 1.4m to 1.2m, with a corresponding increase in maximum magnification to 0.21x.
These changes result in a tiny, but measurable increase in size and weight; the barrel is slightly larger in diameter towards the front, and it’s fractionally longer too. But if you’re already lugging around a lens this size, you certainly won’t notice the difference.
Specifications compared
The table below gives a summary of the key specification differences between the two lenses:
|
Canon 70-200mm F2.8 L IS II USM
|
Canon 70-200mm F2.8 L IS USM
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Lens Construction | • 23 elements/19 groups • 5 UD elements • 1 Fluorite element |
• 23 elements/18 groups • 4 UD elements |
| Minimum focus | 1.2m | 1.4m |
| Maximum magnification | 0.21x at 200mm | 0.17x at 200mm |
| Image stabilization | 4 stops claimed | 3 stops claimed |
| Weight (lens only) | 1486g (3.28 lb) | 1470g (3.25 lb) |
| Weight with accs* | 1720 g (3.80 lb) | 1704 g (3.75 lb) |
| Dimensions | 89 mm diameter x 199 mm length (3.5 x 7.8 in) |
86.2 mm diameter x 197 mm length (3.4 x 7.8 in) |
| Hood | ET-87 (has locking button) | ET-86 |
*Measured weight with all accessories: tripod mount ring, hood, and front and rear caps
Design
The 70-200m F2.8 is one of Canon’s L series professional quality lenses, and therefore built to the very highest standards. The construction appears to be essentially of metal, and the internal focus and zoom design gives a sense of robustness and solidity to the ‘one-piece’ design which few other lenses match. The lens is moisture and dust resistant, and incorporates a rubber ‘O’-ring around the mount to provide a seal with the camera body. The striking off-white color to is apparently designed to reduce the effects of heating under direct sunlight (and quite possibly not without some degree of marketing value).
The lens is pretty typical in size for its class, and therefore potential upgraders should appreciate that it’s significantly larger and heavier than consumer telezooms such as the 70-300mm F4-5.6 IS USM. This therefore may well not be a lens you’ll want to carry around all day when exploring a new city, for example.
On the camera
![]() |
![]() |
This is a sizeable lens, and therefore handles best on larger bodies such as the 1D(s) series, although it still works very well on intermediate bodies such as the 5D Mark II and 7D. The balance of the lens is excellent, and the zoom ring is positioned perfectly towards the center of gravity of the lens/body combination; however a distinct shift in grip is required to operate the manual focus ring. Perhaps surprisingly, the lens also proves to be reasonably workable on compact EOS bodies such as the 550D, by holding the combination primarily by the lens and treating the camera essentially as a glorified rear lens cap.
Autofocus
This lens features Canon’s ultrasonic motor for autofocus, which performs extremely well; it’s practically silent in operation, and we saw no evidence of any systematic focusing errors. We found focusing to be extremely fast and accurate in everyday use on all of the bodies used for testing, however it must be noted that focus speed and accuracy is dependent upon a number of variables, including the camera body used, subject contrast, and light levels.
Change in angle of view on focusing
The EF 70-200mm F2.8 L IS II USM changes its angle of view quite markedly on focusing, becoming narrower at closer distances. This is much the same behavior as the older lens and most others of this type, but notably opposite to Nikon’s 70-200mm F2.8 VR II, which gets rather wider on focusing closer.
Lens body elements
Reported aperture vs focal length
This lens allows an aperture range from F2.8 to F32 at all focal lengths.
Conclusion – Pros
- Exceptional image quality
- Superb build quality, including dust- and water-sealing
- Highly effective image stabilization
- Excellent autofocus and manual override
Conclusion – Cons
- Relatively harsh rendition of out-of-focus areas of the image
- Somewhat susceptible to flare with direct light sources in or close to the frame
- Inconvenient design of tripod mount ring (can’t be detached without taking lens off camera)
Overall conclusion
The Canon EF 70-200mm F2.8 L IS II USM comes as a welcome update for Canon’s professional fast telephoto zoom. While we liked the old version when we reviewed it two years ago, the rapid increase in pixel count on the latest generations of cameras (coupled, it must be said, with Canon’s insistence that all those extra pixels are there to provide a greater scope for cropping) has placed its optical qualities and autofocus capabilities under ever finer scrutiny, and as a result it has been found increasingly wanting (especially on the likes of the EOS 7D).
The new version changes all that, providing quite simply breathtaking optical performance on both APS-C and full-frame bodies. It’s exceptionally sharp, even wide open at F2.8 – so much so that there’s practically no visible improvement in the center on stopping down, and just a little at the corners. Chromatic aberration is extremely low (helped no doubt by that fluorite element), distortion well under control, and vignetting more or less average for its class. This all makes for a hugely impressive showing in our studio tests, especially when compared to its predecessor. However it does come at the expense of the quality of the rendition of out-of-focus regions of the image (or ‘bokeh’), which tend to look a bit more ‘busy’ and obtrusive compared to the old lens.
According to our tests and shooting experience, Canon has also made good on its promise to improve the image stabilization system, which now delivers sharp images hand held at shutter speeds about a stop slower than before. Couple this with fast and reliable autofocus, and the lens simply delivers the goods time after time with the minimum of fuss – exactly what you’d hope for (and expect) at this level.
In terms of build and handling, there’s very little to complain about either. The lens maintains the same solid metal-bodied, dust- and water-sealed construction as the older version, and the slightly wider focusing ring and locking button on the lens hood come as small but welcome improvements. About the only remaining (minor) criticism is with the design of the tripod mount ring, which can’t be removed without detaching the lens from the camera body, and has no alignment markings for shooting in portrait format.
Perhaps the one blot on the landscape is relatively unimpressive image quality at close focus distances, making the shorter minimum focus, and improved maximum magnification, a little less useful than it looks on paper. However it must be noted that our test sample clearly displayed some asymmetry in the optics at close focus distances, with the right side of the frame becoming visibly softer than the left – something which may not be representative of the design as a whole.
Overall, then, the EF 70-200mm F2.8 L IS II USM gains about as close as it gets to an unqualified recommendation, given the price. Its combination of exceptional optics and quirk-free design even manages to surpass Nikon’s equivalent that we tested recently, stealing the crown of ‘Best in Class’ by a whisker. It’s a significant improvement over what was already an accomplished lens, capable of consistently delivering results that will satisfy the most demanding of users, and you can’t ask for much more than that.
Article From : http://www.dpreview.com/lensreviews/canon_70-200_2p8_is_usm_ii_c16/
Price In Indonesia : ± Rp 19.350.000,-
My Comment : I think Canon EF 70-200 F2.8 L IS II USM is the best choice for a professional to photograph the model.
| Print article | This entry was posted by Richard Nathaniel on June 6, 2010 at 13:44, and is filed under English Language. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |



























about 9 months ago
Thank you for your good writeup. It the reality is was a new amusement accounts it. Appear advanced to help far included agreeable as a result of you! Also, how may well we explain?
about 9 months ago
Hi. I just noticed that your site looks like it has a few code problems at the very bottom of your blog’s page. I’m not sure if everybody is getting this same error when browsing your site? I am employing a totally different browser than most people, referred to as Opera, so that is what might be causing it? I just wanted to make sure you know. Thanks for posting some great postings and I’ll try to return back with a completely different browser to check things out!
about 9 months ago
Many thanks for this article. It has absolutely helped during my understanding. I’m pretty distinctive Sick arrive to this site. Thank you once more, companion. xDD
about 9 months ago
Your post can be inspiration for me to review more about this concern. I should concede your lucidity widened my sights and I will forthwith snatch your rss nourish to remain updated on any incoming content articles you may publish. Bravo for any done well write-up!
about 9 months ago
Hi,
ich habe Ihre Webseite bei der Suche nach digitalen Bilderrahmen im Internet gefunden. Schauen Sie doch mal auf meiner Seite vorbei, ich habe dort viele Testberichte zu den aktuellen Windeleimern geschrieben.
about 9 months ago
Omg… Just checked on (Google|Yahoo|Bing|Facebook) that Amy Wine House Is Dead
about 9 months ago
I do love the manner in which you have presented this particular challenge plus it does indeed provide me personally some fodder for consideration. However, from just what I have seen, I only hope when the actual feedback stack on that folks keep on issue and don’t get started upon a tirade regarding the news of the day. All the same, thank you for this excellent point and while I can not necessarily agree with this in totality, I value your point of view.
about 9 months ago
Interesting, but I disagree with you. For me, not enough specifics. One example is enough. So I do not have convinced me. Why will expand its entry with a wider group of cases. It will be nice.
about 9 months ago
excellent article, i definitely adore this web site, keep it.
about 9 months ago
Describe an interesting, but lacking specifics. Why this is so. Can you write more and more concretely. I’ll be very grateful.
about 9 months ago
Great job, I enjoyed reading this !
about 9 months ago
Some truly nice stuff on this web site , I enjoy it.
about 9 months ago
yeah bookmaking this wasn’t a high risk determination outstanding post! .
about 9 months ago
This is getting a bit more subjective, but I much prefer the Zune Marketplace. The interface is colorful, has more flair, and some cool features like ‘Mixview’ that let you quickly see related albums, songs, or other users related to what you’re listening to. Clicking on one of those will center on that item, and another set of “neighbors” will come into view, allowing you to navigate around exploring by similar artists, songs, or users. Speaking of users, the Zune “Social” is also great fun, letting you find others with shared tastes and becoming friends with them. You then can listen to a playlist created based on an amalgamation of what all your friends are listening to, which is also enjoyable. Those concerned with privacy will be relieved to know you can prevent the public from seeing your personal listening habits if you so choose.
about 9 months ago
hi, I’ve been ranking high for “clickbank scam”.
about 9 months ago
Excellent review of the film. Thanks to you I will not be tortured in the cinema. The film is not completely in my taste and theme.
about 9 months ago
The very crux of your writing while sounding agreeable initially, did not work well with me personally after some time. Someplace within the paragraphs you actually managed to make me a believer but only for a while. I nevertheless have got a problem with your leaps in assumptions and one might do nicely to help fill in all those gaps. When you actually can accomplish that, I will definitely be impressed.
about 9 months ago
I was wondering how a girl will be notebook best for us. Your review has helped us greatly. Carefully compared the models on which they wondered.
about 9 months ago
Interesting, but I disagree with you. For me, not enough specifics. One example is enough. So I do not have convinced me. Why will expand its entry with a wider group of cases. It will be nice.
about 9 months ago
I was looking for a guide to programming. Your course is excellent. Everything is well described. First, theory, and later examples.
about 9 months ago
require to know by now, your writing will go to the essence of the matter. Your lucidity leaves me seeking to know more. I’m going to instantly seize your feed to keep up up to together with internet website. Alleging thank you is just my little way of saying what a masterpiece for any extraordinary resource. Tackle my greatest needs for your next article.
about 9 months ago
Norine Laffoon
about 9 months ago
Substantially, the post is really the sweetest on this precious topic. I fit in with your conclusions and will eagerly look forward to your coming updates. Simply saying thanks will not simply be sufficient, for the fantastic lucidity in your writing. I will at once grab your rss feed to stay abreast of any updates. Genuine work and also much success in your business efforts!
about 9 months ago
A very very interesting article! I’ll try to track that continues here! Thank you.
about 9 months ago
Again, were talking personal lives here, but, he probably needs to change the company he keeps and sit back and look at the successes he has that many havent. Maybe it will sink in. People can learn from mistakes and change for the better. Maybe this is that chance for him and its severe enough that it may finally hit home. Antwon is a great part of OTH and I dont want to see him go. Lets just hope for the best for OTH and for Antwon himself. If you like/love people you accept them as they are and do what you can to help them and encourage betterment. The guy is down and out right now Im sure. He doesnt need to be verbally abused up here. I know how people feed off other peoples faults or misfortunes. Thats a fault in itself in my book.
about 9 months ago
If you’re nonetheless on the fence: seize your favorite headsets, mind as a result of the Biggest score and get to put all of them in to a Zune next an iPod and find out what type appears better to you, as well as which user interface makes you laugh more. After that you’ll understand which is right for you.
about 9 months ago
Dude lovin the net today thanks for the great blog I will have to share it. Im a music video guy myself always looking for youtube music videos.
about 9 months ago
With every thing that seems to be building within this specific subject matter, a significant percentage of viewpoints tend to be quite stimulating. On the other hand, I appologize, because I do not give credence to your entire suggestion, all be it exciting none the less. It would seem to us that your remarks are not completely justified and in simple fact you are generally yourself not even wholly certain of the argument. In any case I did enjoy reading through it.
about 9 months ago
It’s good to determine this information within your post, I is looking an identical but there were not whatever proper useful resource, thanx these days I Thank with the post. I actually loved reading your site. It was potentially authored and great.
about 9 months ago
Im no expert, but I feel you just made the best point. You undoubtedly fully understand what youre speaking about, and I can actually get behind that. Thanks for being so upfront and so straightforward.
about 9 months ago
Wouldn’t it end up being alright to use your Rss or atom for this site?
about 9 months ago
After i view the RSS feed it appears to become great deal involving unformatted html page, will be the issue on my small audience?
about 9 months ago
I do love the manner in which you have framed this challenge and it does indeed provide us some fodder for consideration. Nonetheless, through what I have observed, I simply hope as other feedback stack on that people keep on point and don’t get started upon a soap box regarding the news du jour. Anyway, thank you for this fantastic piece and although I do not really go along with the idea in totality, I respect your point of view.